The image “http://www.votetrustusa.org/images/votetrust-small2.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

 

The nation's clearinghouse for election audit information!
State and Local Election Integrity Organizations
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Maryland
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Montana
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
Ohio
Oregon
Pennsylvania
South Carolina
Tennessee
Texas
Vermont
Virginia
Wisconsin
VoteTrustUSA does not speak on behalf of any of the listed organizations.
: mosShowVIMenu( $params ); break; } ?>

   
Around the States

 

Oregon: Secretary of State Sues ES&S PDF  | Print |  Email
Oregon
By Oregon Secretary of State Press Release   
April 20, 2006

Download the Full Lawsuit in PDF Format

 

Secretary of State Bill Bradbury (pictured at right) has filed a lawsuit against Election Systems & Software, Inc. (ES&S), for breach of contract for failure to deliver the electronic voting machines that would allow people with disabilities to vote privately and independently.

The Help America Vote Act of 2002 requires, among other things, that all states provide people with disabilities the ability to vote with the same privacy and independence as all other citizens by a deadline of January 1, 2006. The federal government can impose penalties on states that fail to meet this requirement, including withdrawal and withholding of federal funds available for elections improvements.

"I'm disappointed in ES&S," said Bradbury. "They agreed to provide us with voting machines, they didn't follow through on that agreement, and that failure directly punishes people with disabilities."

ES&S submitted the winning bid to a request for proposals issued by the Secretary of State in July 2005.  In that bid, ES&S agreed to all of the standard state contract terms, and agreed to provide one million dollars worth of AutoMark touch-screen electronic voting machines by the January 1, 2006 federal deadline.

On January 10, 2006, ES&S informed the Secretary of State that it would not agree to the terms of the contract, and would not deliver the voting machines unless the Secretary changed the terms of the contract. Bradbury refused to alter the contract to meet ES&S's demands, which then led to this lawsuit.

"We will not leave our elections in the hands of companies that do not follow through on their obligations, and we will not be coerced into altering our contracts," said Bradbury.

Read more...
Who Or What Is Stopping The California SoS From Allowing Eligible Californians To Register To Vote? PDF  | Print |  Email
California
By California State Senator Debra Bowen   
April 19, 2006
Legal Opinion Concludes the Roadblock is the Secretary of State

Bowen Says She’ll Introduce Legislation If Secretary of State Continues To Refuse To Alter Deal With Bush Administration That Has Prevented Tens of Thousands of People From Registering To Vote
 
The only thing that’s preventing the Secretary of State from altering his regulations and data matching standards to ensure eligible voters can register to vote is the Secretary of State.

That was the conclusion reached in a legal opinion issued late Tuesday by the Legislative Counsel of California. The opinion states there is nothing in federal or state law requiring the Secretary of State to adopt the regulations and data matching standards he’s been relying on that have combined to prevent tens of thousands of eligible California voters from registering to vote. A copy of the opinion is available here in PDF format.

“It's clear the Secretary has the legal authority to take the steps necessary to ensure eligible voters have the ability to register before the June primary, but whether he’s actually willing to put the voters ahead of the Bush Administration remains to be seen,” said Senator Debra Bowen (D-Redondo Beach), the chairwoman of the Senate Elections, Reapportionment & Constitutional Amendments Committee.

“I’ve been saying for three weeks that this problem needs to get solved and the quickest way to fix it is for the Secretary to abandon his deal with the Bush Administration and change the regulations and the data matching standards he’s adopted that have pulled the rug out from under thousands of eligible voters,” continued Bowen.  “If he won’t fix this problem for the voters, then, like everyone else who thinks preventing eligible voters from registering is a problem, I’m prepared to try and correct it legislatively.”
Read more...
Train Wreck - "Optical-Scan Voting System Will Fail In May Primary" PDF  | Print |  Email
Ohio
By John Gideon, VotersUnite.org and VoteTrustUSA   
April 19, 2006

Summit County, Ohio Elections Director Says He Can't Assume Anything Else

 

This article was posted on The Brad Blog. It is reposted with permission.


Summit County's memory card (PCMCIA) failures have not gotten any better according to an article in this morning's Akron Beacon Journal. If you recall BradBlog has reported on the Summit County memory card failures in the recent past; most recently on April 4.

Now, in what is clearly a show of "No Confidence" in their voting machine vendor ES&S, the county elections director is predicting failure with the system in the May 2 Ohio state primary.

Summit County Board of Elections Director Bryan Williams is predicting Election Day failures with the memory cards in the county's new optical scan voting system.

"I don't think we can assume anything else,'' Williams said at a meeting Tuesday, where the elections board reviewed the latest list of troubles.
This seems to be a complete melt-down of everything provided to the county by ES&S. The Beacon-Journal goes on to report the problems.
Read more...
Alaska: Democrats File Lawsuit To Get 2004 Election Records PDF  | Print |  Email
Alaska
By Kay Brown, Alaska Democratic Party   
April 18, 2006

The Alaska Democratic Party filed suit in Superior Court today seeking to force the Division of Elections to release public records needed to verify the 2004 election results.
 
"We are asking the court to release these public records so that the people of Alaska can be assured that their votes were counted correctly," said Alaska Democratic Party Chair Jake Metcalfe (pictured at right). "The Division of Elections' numbers do not add up. The Division has refused to release the public records that would allow us to verify the results. All we ask is that the Lt. Governor and the Director of Elections follow the law and meet their obligation to Alaskans so every one knows why these numbers don't add up."


The Alaska Democratic Party has been trying since last year to get the public records of the election in order to find out why there are numerous errors and discrepancies in the state’s reported results of the 2004 general election. The Division of Elections’ latest excuse for refusing to release the election information is that it would create “security risks."
 
"Nothing we have asked for compromises security," Metcalfe said. ""Why is the Division of Elections is so reluctant to provide these public records? What are they trying to hide?"

Read more...
Wisconsin: All Election Integrity is Local PDF  | Print |  Email
Wisconsin
By John Washburn, VoteTrustUSA Voting Technology Task force   
April 17, 2006

It has been pointed out on my blog, my focus on the election irregularities in my home voting district of Gemantown District #1 is petty and I should move down the road to the big fish, the City of Milwaukee. I agree the City of Milwaukee is where 10% of the entire ballots cast in the state of Wisconsin are cast in the 314 wards of the City of Milwaukee. So by the simple application of the Willy Sutton Maxim, the bulk of state fraud is committed there because that is where the votes are. And, I have spent time examining the election irregularities there.

 

I disagree though that I should ignore the election irregularities perpetrated by my neighbors and my village clerk. The Swedes have a delightful proverb, "Sweep your own stoop before youoffer to sweep you neighbor’s stoop" . The same holds for election integrity; more so actually.

 

For more than 25 years we (yes, I am included in this group) have allowed our election process to devolve from an active, vital part of our Republic to a spectator sport where the only participation expected is for 8%to 40% of the citizens to show up, cast a vote and go home to watch a set of results come in. We have systematically accepted the notion that expediency in administering an election is the paramount (or only) criterion to judge election success. We all demanded in our own way that we preferred quick results for elections over accurate results or verifiable results. Just thepress of the immediate: "Who won?" We don’t even ask any more if the resultswhich come in are correct or not. Whichever candidate the machine software says won the race we accept as true without evidence.

 

Except for a literal handful of Cassandras (the Collier Brothers, Rebecca Mercuri, and some uber-geeks on the ACM risk forum), no one, not election administrators, not elected officials, not the press, and most importantly not citizen electors asked the hard question:

 

"Is using secret, unexamined and untested software to tally votes in an election an improvement in election administration?" 

Read more...
Florida: Report on Pinellas County "Audit" PDF  | Print |  Email
Florida
By Voting Integrity Alliance of Tampa Bay   
April 17, 2006
On April 11th and 12th David Drury, Chief, Florida Bureau of Voting Systems Certification (“BVSC”), Richard Harvey, also from the BVSC, and Paul Lux, Assistant Supervisor of Elections from Okaloosa County, Florida, came to Pinellas County, Florida, to make history by conducting the first ever audit of an election in Florida, and the first audit in the nation of an election using Sequoia Voting Systems equipment.

The March 7, 2006 election was a very small election involving only three municipalities, but the tabulation failed, rejecting memory cartridges as “already read,” when in fact they had not been read, and they were unable to restart the tabulation for about two hours. During multiple attempts to restart the tabulation, lines of code were sent via e-mail from Sequoia Voting Systems in an attempt to restart the count. Additionally, one candidate was unable to vote for himself, as reported by the St. Petersburg Times, and another was concerned that early votes in his favor made by family and friends were not reflected in the final vote tallies. The election was certified on March 10th.

Pamela Haengel, Executive Director of Voting Integrity Alliance of Tampa Bay (“VIA Tampa Bay”), immediately alerted Florida Secretary of State, Sue Cobb, to the problems with the March 7, 2006, election, the fact that VIA Tampa Bay’s observer had witnessed and recorded these problems, and called for an audit. VIA Tampa Bay also submitted a four-page public records request covering all documentation from the night of the failure. Though Dawn Roberts, Director, Division of Elections, originally stated that the audit would go forward, the next day a spokesperson for the Division backpedaled and said that they were going to talk to Deborah Clark, Supervisor of Elections of Pinellas County, first before making a decision. A couple days later, Clark sent a letter to the state admitting problems with the elections, blaming not enough database space, but asserting that the results were accurate.  Nonetheless, Clark requested in that letter that the state audit the March 7th election because of, “baseless allegations designed more to discourage rather than enlighten voters,” and that a state audit was needed to “reassure the public.”

When David Drury arrived on Tuesday last week, he admitted, “There are no auditing standards for Florida elections,” and, “We are on a learning curve here.” Despite being provided a copy of “Auditing Elections,” by Doug Jones, Professor of Computer Science, University of Iowa, in advance of the audit, the state decided only to attempt to determine how votes were counted, not– as one might expect from an audit designed to promote voter confidence-- whether the machines accurately recorded votes.  Asked specifically whether the state had a way of testing to be sure the votes were counted accurately, Drury responded, “No test is always accurate.”
Read more...
Maryland: Recap of the 2006 Legislative Session PDF  | Print |  Email
Maryland
By TrueVoteMD   
April 15, 2006

This article was posted at TrueVoteMD.org. It is reposted here with permission. 

 

The legislature failed to pass a Voter-Verified Paper Ballot Audit Trail (VVPBAT) bill again this year.

 

As the session began, in January, many of us were optimistic that 2006 was the year for VVPBAT. Prior to the beginning of the session, in late 2005, TrueVoteMD had organized a massive door-to-door campaign in the district of Delegate Sheila Hixson, the Chair of the House committee that deals with election issues. Early in 2006 Delegate Hixson became a sponsor of a VVPBAT bill that TrueVote considered to be model legislation for dealing with this issue.

 

The model legislation was introduced at the beginning of the session in identical bills, House Bill 244 and Senate Bill 713. The House bill moved rapidly. A subcommittee hearing lasted four hours, during which numerous advocacy groups testified in support of the bill including several representing handicapped citizens. The only opposition that appeared during the hearing was from the State Board of Elections (SBE) and several local boards of elections.

 

A principal opponent of the VVPBAT legislation, as she has been since she first made the decision to purchase paperless voting machines for the State, in 2001, was Linda Lamone, the State Administrator of Elections.

 

At one point, Ms. Lamone was asked about the so-called Hursti hack, an incident that occurred in Florida in December 2005, in which Harry Hursti, a computer security specialist demonstrated the ease with which Diebold memory card-controlled equipment could be made to miscount election results. Ms. Lamone stated that she had not received any information from Diebold regarding this incident. Yet TrueVote has a copy of a letter from Diebold to Ms. Lamone dated four days prior to the hearing stating that the company had given several updates to her and her staff.

 

On February 15th, Governor Ehrlich released a letter to the SBE, expressing concern about paperless voting machines. An exchange of letters between the Governor and the SBE dealt with the Hursti hack and the perceived need for retesting the Diebold machines owned by the state. These are published on the TrueVote site.

 

An amendment to HB244 from Delegate Liz Bobo of Howard County, provided for precinct-based optical-scan counting of the 2006 election. The amendment was offered by Chair Hixson and was adopted.

 

The amended bill, reported by the Ways and Means Committee, passed the House of Delegates by a vote of 137-0 on March 7, 2006, five weeks before the end of the 2006 session. It was hailed by VVPBAT supporters for its detailed language and high standards for both security and transparency.

The House-adopted bill was immediately referred to the Senate Education, Health and Environmental Affairs (ESE) committee, chaired by Senator Paula Hollinger. Prior to holding a hearing on HB 244, Senator Hollinger invited Diebold to demonstrate its newest paperless voting machine, the TSx. No other vendors were invited to the demonstration.

 

During the session, Diebold was hardly a silent voice in Annapolis. They hired a former staffer for Senate President Miller as a lobbyist, and a former Mikulski staff person to be their P.R. person. The Elections Administrator has been in Annapolis for many years and is said to have close ties to Senate President Mike Miller. This trio spread rumors around the state about the alleged inaccuracy of optical scanners.

 

Read more...
UPDATE: A Closer Look at the E-Voting Lawsuit Filed against a PA County and U.S. Dept. of Justice PDF  | Print |  Email
Pennsylvania
By John Gideon, VotersUnite.org and VoteTrustUSA   
April 14, 2006

Seeks to Stop Last Minute Implementation of ES&S Voting Machines and to Push Back Unconstitutional Threats by the DoJ

 

This article appeared in The Brad Blog. It is reposted with permission. 

 

The BRAD BLOG has received a copy of the "Complaint For Declaratory and Injunctive Relief", as filed earlier this week in Allegheny County, PA, by several disabled voters. The complete suit is now available here [WORD format].

As the suit itself is some 43 pages, we will distill it for you a bit, and cover the most notable aspects. The BRAD BLOG is just thoughtful that way.

As we reported on Wednesday, the complaint was filed against the Pennsylvania Secretary of State, other state and county officials, an Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division of the US Dept. of Justice, and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

The complaint asserts that the state certified Electronic Voting Machines made by Elections Systems & Software, Inc. (ES&S) are not accessible by voters with disabilities -- contrary to the requirements of the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002 and the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). Nonetheless, Allegheny County has selected their machines for use in upcoming elections. That, after previously hoping to go with Diebold, and then with Sequoia Voting Systems, until finally settling on ES&S after the first two choices fell apart either due to the politics of the companies involved and/or due to the discovery their Electronic Voting Systems were found to be hackable.


Read more...
Illinois: Republicans and Democrats Challenge Accuracy of Primary Election Results PDF  | Print |  Email
Illinois
By Warren Stewart, VoteTrustUSA   
April 14, 2006

Candidates from both major political parties are planning challenges to last month's primary elections in Illinois. Concerns about the accuracy of election results were raised already on election night and have grown since then.

 

According to WBBM:

Cook County Republican leaders want 20 percent of the votes from the March primary recounted, because they fear problems with new voting equipment and untrained election judges may have tainted the results.

Meanwhile attorney and Democratic candidate Frank Avila is threatening to file a federal lawsuit on behalf of Democrats and Republicans.
The Chicago Tribune wrote that Fueled by concerns about "poor management and organizational incompetence," Maureen Murphy, vice chair of the county GOP and a member of the county Board of Review, said she has met with about 200 suburban election judges who detailed a litany of problems from the March 21 primary.

Among the issues, she said, were a touch-screen voting machine that "blew up like an M80" and had to be unplugged; machines showing votes that hadn't been cast; and machines not working at all. In one meeting she asked about 125 judges how many of them were confident that every vote at their polling place had been counted, and no hands went up, she said.

 

Nevertheless election officials, as usual, assured candidates and voters alike that somehow the votes were counted accurately. Chicago Elections Board chairman Langdon Neal says a mandated 5 percent recount has already certified the count was accurate, saying problems with voting machines and elections judges who weren't able to handle the equipment, affected the speed of the vote counting, but not the accuracy.

Indiana to Investigate ES&S and MicroVote PDF  | Print |  Email
Indiana
By Warren Stewart, VoteTrustUSA   
April 13, 2006
According an article in the Indianapolis Star, Indiana Secretary of State Todd Rokita (pictured at right)  is investigating possible law violations by Election Systems and Software (ES&S) and MicroVote. A series of alarming reports of irregularities in the Indiana press and reports of the sale of uncertified voting systems, have focused national attention on primaries scheduled for Indiana next month.
 

In a statement issued today, Secretary of State Todd Rokita explained “To protect the voices of Hoosier voters, I intend to hold hearings on these matters to determine whether Indiana law has been violated, and if so, to hold the appropriate parties accountable,” 

 

“Hoosier taxpayers, voters and county officials deserve voting systems that comply with the high standards mandated by Indiana law.”
 
The statement from Rokita today pointed to “county sequencing errors and paper ballot problems (that) have combined to quickly escalate already disturbingly poor service at the county level into what could be a significant violation of state election law.”
 
Rokita said his office, which administers elections across the state, would bring an “enforcement action” to determined whether Election Systems and Software, a Nebraska voting system company, should be fined.

According to the Indianapolis Star article, a separate investigation has targeted another election systems vendor, Indiana-based MicroVote General Corporation.

The article quoted Rokita, “The secretary of state's office has learned that MicroVote may have sold, or attempted to sell, Indiana county voting machines whose Indiana certifications have lapsed”.
Pennsylvania: Lawsuit Filed In Allegheny County Seeks To Stop Purchase of iVotronics PDF  | Print |  Email
Pennsylvania
By Warren Stewart, VoteTrustUSA   
April 12, 2006

Download the Full Complaint 

 

Associated Press is reporting that a group of Allegheny County residents along with national nonprofit organization People for the American Way, have filed suit today in federal court in Pittsburgh against county, state and federal officials.

 

The news story explained that:

The lawsuit filed today says that decision risks chaos on Election Day because of the lack of time to train election officials and educate voters about the change from lever machines which have been in use for 40 years.

“This rush to a new and flawed technology just weeks before the election threatens to sow chaos in the primary and compromise the fundamental rights of thousands of voters for years to come,” says Harry Litman, the former United States Attorney in Pittsburgh and an attorney for the plaintiffs. “It’s a bad deal for Allegheny County, and, we believe, a violation of federal law.”

The suit, Celeste Taylor v. Dan Onorato asks the court to prevent use of machines manufactured by Election Systems & Software until the County has spent the time necessary to identify voting systems that are secure; reliable; and accessible to voters with disabilities.
Complaining that the federal Department of Justice has pressured Allegheny to buy ES&S iVotronic or be forced to return $11.9 million in federal funding, the group is seeking an injunction to require the county to continue using lever machines instead of using touch-screen machines the county agreed to purchase last week from Election Systems & Software for $11.9 million. The machines were the county's second choice after machines manufactured by Sequoia Voting Systems failed to pass state certification tests.

The defendants in the case are the Pennsylvania Secretary of State; Dan Onorato, Allegheny County Chief Executive; James Flynn, County Manager; and senior officials at the federal Department of Justice.

 

Maryland: Senate Democrats Defeat Verifiable Elections PDF  | Print |  Email
Maryland
By Warren Stewart, VoteTrustUSA   
April 11, 2006

Maryland voters will vote on paperless touchscreen voting machines again this year thanks to concerted efforts by Democratic State Senate President Mike Miller and Senator Paula Hollinger, chair of the committee on Education, Health, and Environmental Affairs.

 

In a disappointment to election integrity activists nationwide, the Senate killed a bill that had passed unanimously in the Maryland House of Delegates that would have called for voter verified paper records and mandatory audits on thde last day of the legislative session. As sent to the Senate, the bill also included an amendment that called for implementing a paper ballot optical scan voting system for this year's elections. In addition to the unanimous support of the House of Delegates, the proposal also had the full support of Governor Robert Ehrlich, Jr. (R).

 

Senator Hollinger is running for the U.S. House seat currently held by Rep. Benjamin Cardin. Senator Hollinger has ensured that it will be impossible to independently verify the results of that election results and that the votes of Maryland citizens will be counted by propreitary software provided by Diebold Election Systems.

Illinois: Much Ado... PDF  | Print |  Email
Illinois
By Robert A. Wilson, chair, Suburban Cook County Chapter, Illinois Ballot-Integrity Project   
April 11, 2006

Chicago City Council Hearing Pursues “Venezuelan Connection” - Ignores Substantive Issues

Friday’s joint hearings conducted by the Chicago City Council’s Committees on Finance, Budget and Government Operations and Committee on Committees, Rules and Ethics failed to shed much light on the “events and problems that occurred during vote tabulation for the City of Chicago Primary Election held on March 21, 2006,” as stated in the meeting’s agenda.  

Alderman Ed Burke (14th) led off the hearing with a statement expressing concerns and then proceeded with two hours of sharp questioning of Jack Blaine, president of Sequoia Voting Systems, Inc., the company that supplied the voting systems used in both the City of Chicago and suburban Cook County.

 

Occasionally joined by Alderman Richard Mell (33rd) and Alderman William Beavers (7th), Burke, chairman of the Council’s Finance Committee presented a timeline chart relating to the acquisition of Sequoia by Bocca Raton, Florida-based Smartmatic Corporation in March 2005.  Throughout, Blaine professed to have little knowledge of Smartmatic’s Board of Directors or principal investors or stockholders, even though he serves as president of Smartmatic as well as Sequoia.  Blaine even professed ignorance of the price Smartmatic paid to acquire an 85% interest in Sequoia from De La Rue Cash Systems 13 months ago, stating only that it “was less than $20 million.”  Of course, it was widely reported in the financial press at the time that the purchase price was $17.6 million, but apparently Blaine doesn’t pay much attention to details like major acquisitions his company might have made.

At issue was a disclosure affidavit which Sequoia had completed on August 3, 2005, as a part of the procurement process. The form, which requires the disclosure of officers and directors of the corporation and anyone having a more than 7-1/2 percent interest in the company is silent as to Smartmatic’s majority interest in Sequoia. The affidavit, signed by then Sequoia president, Tracy Graham, lists only herself as president and “J. Blaine” as secretary. Blaine consistently deflected questions about the contract between Sequoia and the Chicago Board of Election Commissioners, suggesting that Howard Cramer, vice president of sales, was responsible. At one point Blaine appeared to disassociate himself from the contract (actually a number of separate agreements) by indicating that Cramer might have been the signatory. However, some of the documents, signed only eight months ago, which Blaine claims he did not know about or did not remember, bear what purports to be his signature, but do not disclose his title as required.

Read more...
INDIANA TV NEWS: ES&S Breaks State Law -- Again! PDF  | Print |  Email
Indiana
By John Gideon, VotersUnite.org and VoteTrustUSA   
April 05, 2006
No Early Voting Ballots Provided, Just Electronic Touch-Screen Voting Machines that Don't Work

Paper Ballots Are Used in the Meantime as ES&S Succeeds at Failing Yet Again…

THE GOOD NEWS: A Local TV News Outlet That Reports Actual News!

 

This article was published on The Brad Blog and is reposted with permission.

Proving that local TV News stations actually can serve their viewers by actually investigating stuff that matters, and then reporting on it, Indianapolis' WISH-TV 8 does it again. In yet another report on local election problems, WISH-TV has been keeping their viewers informed with a series of stories on voting issues.

"Well, once again, a Voting Machine Company is breaking Indiana law and violating county contracts," the story by reporter Pam Elliot began.

Last night, WISH TV 8 reported on the failure of Elections Systems & Software (ES&S) to perform up to their contract with their customers. That contract: to provide ballots to voters and touch-screen voting equipment that actually works.

Johnson County Indiana was supposed to have their ES&S iVotronic DRE (touch-screen) machines set-up and in use for "absentee voting". However, contrary to their contract and, as WISH TV reports, in violation of state law, ES&S has failed to program the counties "smart cards" with ballot definitions. Which means the voting machines are of no use.

Also missing are printed paper ballots for Johnson County and nearly two-dozen other counties across the state. Which means that in order for these counties to conduct "absentee voting" they will have to copy paper ballots and provide those to the voters.

Read more...
Take Action for Voter Verified Paper Ballots in Maryland PDF  | Print |  Email
Maryland
By VerifiedVoting.org   
April 05, 2006

VerifiedVoting.org has launched an action alert in support of Maryland House Bill 244 as passed unanimously by the Maryland House of Delegates. VoteTrustUSA wholeheartedly supports this citizen action and encourages all Maryland residents to sned a message to the Maryland Senate.

 

Your help got H.B. 244, Delegate Hixson's voter-verified paper record bill, passed unanimously in the House. The Senate version has been gutted, though, and your support is needed one more time -- without your effort, Maryland may not get verifiable voting this year.

The original version of the bills, H.B. 244 and S.B. 713, contained many good provisions, including a robust random manual audit requirement which will help ensure that voting systems are working as they should. H.B. 244 was amended to include a requirement that all Maryland elections this year will be conducted using paper optical scan ballots (with accessible ballot-marking devices). 

Insist that the Senate pass the House version of the bill. VerifiedVoting.org joins TrueVoteMD.org in asking you to contact your Senators today -- ask them to dump the bad version of the bill, and pass the language in H.B.244 as it passed the House. The Governor is ready to sign and fund it.

Even if you wrote before, you can send another email or fax in less than 60 seconds. It can make all the difference.

It takes less than a minute to send a free fax or email to your senator from the VerifiedVoting.org Action Center.

More...
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Results 586 - 650 of 1006
State Resources
Election Law @ Moritz
Electionline
National Conference of State Legislatures
Verified Voting
Model Legislation
: mosShowVIMenu( $params ); break; } ?>
State Pages
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Jersey
New Hampshire
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Guam
Puerto Rico
: mosShowVIMenu( $params ); break; } ?>